Mrs. X organized outings where wedding dresses and accessories were tried on. It claimed the reduced VAT rate because the service it provided had to be regarded as providing access to a primary and permanent facility equipped for entertainment and daytime recreation as referred to in item b.14, letter g, of Table I.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Refund Request Denied Due to Late Submission: Court of Appeal Decision 2025
- Pension Fund’s Insurance Service Exempt from VAT; No Right to Input Tax Deduction
- VAT Assessment Upheld Due to Missing Invoices and Insufficient Proof for Deductions and Loans
- Fiscal Unity for VAT Due to Close Financial and Economic Ties Upheld by Court
- EU Court: Spain Must Grant VAT Exemption for Group-Provided Cleaning Services to Members
