The fact that BV X was obliged to observe secrecy with regard to that which was entrusted to it in the context of the performance of its duties as a tax adviser was also of no benefit to it in view of Article 51 of the AWR,
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Supreme Court: intermission drink should be taxed separately for VAT purposes
- Provision of accommodation to employees is service for consideration
- Access to the park performance qualifies as granting access to the cinema. Reduced VAT rate applies.
- Extension of a reasonable period if the representative is insufficiently available for hearings?
- No VAT exemption after legally valid termination of an earlier position
