A BV argued that VAT was wrongly levied on the amounts received in December 2010 for sports subscriptions that commenced on or after 1 January 2011. According to A BV, VAT was only due in 2011. According to A BV, VAT was only due if all relevant elements of the chargeable event were known.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Supreme Court: intermission drink should be taxed separately for VAT purposes
- Provision of accommodation to employees is service for consideration
- Access to the park performance qualifies as granting access to the cinema. Reduced VAT rate applies.
- Extension of a reasonable period if the representative is insufficiently available for hearings?
- No VAT exemption after legally valid termination of an earlier position
