The Zeeland-West-Brabant District Court has ruled that it is not plausible that the deliveries took place in the Netherlands, so that VAT was incorrectly charged. The interested party demonstrates that it has paid the undue VAT, so that it can deduct it as input tax.
The dispute concerns the additional assessment for turnover tax for the years 2015 and 2016 and the first quarter of 2017, as well as the refund decision for the first quarter of 2017.
Source
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT on Management Services for CDC Pension Fund: Not a Common Investment Fund, Appeal Dismissed
- Court Upholds Fine for Late VAT Filing; Objection Partially Granted, Penalty Deemed Appropriate
- VAT Zero Rate Denied for Export of Horse Shares: Appeal Unsuccessful, Tax Assessment Upheld
- VAT Exemption Denied for Services to Pension Funds with CDC and DC Schemes, Court Rules
- VAT Exemption for Pension Fund Management: Distinction Between Accumulation and Payout Phases Disputed
