The Zeeland-West-Brabant District Court has ruled that it is not plausible that the deliveries took place in the Netherlands, so that VAT was incorrectly charged. The interested party demonstrates that it has paid the undue VAT, so that it can deduct it as input tax.
The dispute concerns the additional assessment for turnover tax for the years 2015 and 2016 and the first quarter of 2017, as well as the refund decision for the first quarter of 2017.
Source
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Mandatory E-Invoicing in the EU: What Does ViDA Mean for Your SME Clients?
- Dutch Tax Authorities Announce Major Changes to 13th Directive VAT Refund Procedure
- ViDA E‑Invoicing and Digital Reporting in the Netherlands: Strategic Choices and Phased Timeline to 2032
- VAT OSS in the Netherlands: Managing Multi-Channel Marketplace Sales and Bookkeeping Challenges
- Cabinet Response to ViDA E-Invoicing and Digital Reporting Report Sent to House of Representatives
