According to BV X, a showroom or website was not necessary because the trade often took place in a more or less private setting. According to the District Court, BV X had not made this concrete with objective data. It had not submitted any documents showing how it had attempted to gain a position on the market for exclusive cars and which channels or contacts it had used.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Thrift Shops Return to Court Over VAT Collection Dispute
- Customs Court Rules Doctor Role Play Set as Toys, Not Clothing
- Adjustment of VAT deduction for services on immovable property: What can you still do?
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss
