According to BV X, a showroom or website was not necessary because the trade often took place in a more or less private setting. According to the District Court, BV X had not made this concrete with objective data. It had not submitted any documents showing how it had attempted to gain a position on the market for exclusive cars and which channels or contacts it had used.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Mandatory E-Invoicing in the EU: What Does ViDA Mean for Your SME Clients?
- Dutch Tax Authorities Announce Major Changes to 13th Directive VAT Refund Procedure
- ViDA E‑Invoicing and Digital Reporting in the Netherlands: Strategic Choices and Phased Timeline to 2032
- VAT OSS in the Netherlands: Managing Multi-Channel Marketplace Sales and Bookkeeping Challenges
- Cabinet Response to ViDA E-Invoicing and Digital Reporting Report Sent to House of Representatives
