- Background of the Dispute: The case centers on the VAT treatment of brokerage services provided by Company X to Company T in 2012 for a sale valued at EUR 1 million, where payment was structured in five annual installments starting in 2013. The German Tax Office argued that VAT should have been paid in 2012, while Company X contended that VAT was only due upon receipt of each installment.
- Court Questions and ECJ Ruling: The Federal Finance Court referred questions to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) about the applicability of Articles 64(1) and 90(1) of the EU VAT Directive. The ECJ ruled that Article 64(1) does not apply to one-time services paid in installments, emphasizing that VAT is chargeable at the time of service delivery. Additionally, unpaid installments do not qualify as non-payment under Article 90(1), meaning VAT cannot be reduced based on future payment uncertainties.
- Implications for Businesses: The ECJ’s decision highlights the importance of understanding when VAT is chargeable, particularly for businesses providing one-time services with installment payments. Companies must ensure compliance with VAT regulations to avoid cash flow issues and potential penalties, as neither Article 64(1) nor Article 90(1) supports reducing VAT obligations based on unpaid installments.
Source VATabout
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ/CJEU/General Court VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
