After the third referral by the Supreme Court, the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court ruled that the inspector did not make it plausible that X2 bv only had the role of financier or lender in the trading chain. It is true that the cars were actually stored elsewhere, but it was X2 bv that registered the cars with its own insurer and assumed that it ran the inventory risk for this. X2 bv has therefore rightly deducted the input tax in question.
Source: taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Guidelines for New VAT Rules on Mixed-Use Properties Effective from July 2025
- 7 Tips to Speed Up VAT Return Processing and Minimize Delays
- VAT Increase on Hotels Could Lead to Billions in Losses for Tourism Sector
- No VAT Deduction for Family Business Succession Advisory Costs, Court Rules Against A BV
- Proposed VAT Increase on Tourism Yields No Net Gain, Faces Parliamentary Vote