A fine distinction is often required to be made to establish the correct VAT treatment of a supply. In this case a degree of semantics was required to determine whether the panels were energy-saving materials (even when they certainly saved energy). On such small things turned the assessment of £2.6 million here. It always pays to double check VAT treatments rather than making assumptions.
Source: marcusward.co
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Implements EPR Scheme: Producers Pay Fees for Packaging Waste Management Starting 2025
- Rachel Reeves Considers VAT Adjustments Amid Budget Challenges Despite Labour’s Pledge
- Cayman Implements New Taxes on Imported Vehicles
- Tribunal Rules Nitrous Oxide Not Zero-Rated Food in Telamara VAT Case
- HMRC Updates VAT Notice 700/18: New Guidelines for Bad Debt Relief Claims
