A fine distinction is often required to be made to establish the correct VAT treatment of a supply. In this case a degree of semantics was required to determine whether the panels were energy-saving materials (even when they certainly saved energy). On such small things turned the assessment of £2.6 million here. It always pays to double check VAT treatments rather than making assumptions.
Source: marcusward.co
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Court Rules HMRC Wrongly Denied Hotel Supplier’s £10.2 Million VAT Claims
- New Updates on Correcting VAT Errors: Key Changes and Guidance for Businesses
- Colleges Win £2.8 Million Tax Rebates Amid VAT Rule Dispute with HMRC
- Tribunal Rules on VAT Status of Government Grants for Free Educational Services by Colleges
- The UK Should Lower or Abolish, Not Raise, Its VAT Registration Threshold
