The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed the GST Dept. to grant appropriate time to Subway before forcing it to pay differential GST on Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). The Subway has dragged the indirect tax department to court over allegedly forcing it to pay differential Goods and Services Tax on services before issuing any notices. It was further stated that the tax department had issued multiple summonses to top management over taxability of intellectual property rights.
Source Taxscan
Latest Posts in "India"
- AAR Rules GST Applies to Small Packaged Shrimp Exports, Citing Retail Packaging Criteria
- Supreme Court to Decide if Leasehold Rights Transfer is Taxable Under GST Law
- Only Entity Named as Exporter in Customs Documents Can Claim Service Tax Refund: CESTAT
- CESTAT: Testing Services to Foreign Clients Qualify as ‘Export of Services’ under FTDR Act
- CESTAT Rules Dell India’s Services to Foreign Affiliates Qualify as Export, Allows Appeal
