Ambiguity and delay in any dispute resolution mechanism is undesirable for any system including taxation. Ever since the introduction of GST more than four years ago, we have seen a steep rise in litigation mainly due to the reason of ambiguous legal provisions. Further, consequent to non-constitution of an Appellate Tribunal, the first level of appellate decisions is accumulating against assessees who are awaiting setting of the Appellate Tribunal in order to provide clarity or decisions on various issues.
Source: mondaq.com
Latest Posts in "India"
- Eight States Demand GST Rate Cuts Be Tied to Revenue Guarantee and Consumer Benefits
- CII Urges Corporates to Transfer GST Rate Cut Benefits to Consumers Before Festive Season
- DGFT Extends Export Obligation Period, Boosting Indian Textile Exporters’ Competitiveness
- GST 2.0: New Two-Slab Tax Regime Announced, Healthcare and Essentials to Get Cheaper
- L’Oreal India Distributor Found Guilty of Not Passing GST Rate-Cut Benefits to Consumers
