The judgment ECJ C-80/20 illustrates the dilemma between the EU law general principles and some particularities of VAT. Faced with the denial of a deduction, it is not strange to hear the argument of “no problem, a corrective invoice can be issued and deducted later, it is not necessary to appeal.” However, that is easier said then done…
Source Francisco Javier Sánchez Gallardo (pdf file)
See also
- ECJ C-80/20 (Wilo Salmson France) – Decision – Cancellation and reissuance of invoice does not change period for which VAT refund can be requested
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Right to Deduct VAT and ”Substance over form” concept
Join our Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU Weighs VAT Reform for Financial Services Amid Crypto and Fintech Growth
- ECJ VAT Case – C-512/26 (Commission v Spain) – Action – VAT rates reform: failure to transpose Directive (EU) 2022/542
- ECJ VAT Case – C-504/26 (Commission v Spain) – Action – Small enterprises VAT scheme: failure to transpose Directive (EU) 2020/285
- New European Court VAT Case – T-520/26 (Frexport) – No details known yet
- New European Court VAT Case – T-519/26 (Liege Cargo Agency) – No details known yet
