The judgment ECJ C-80/20 illustrates the dilemma between the EU law general principles and some particularities of VAT. Faced with the denial of a deduction, it is not strange to hear the argument of “no problem, a corrective invoice can be issued and deducted later, it is not necessary to appeal.” However, that is easier said then done…
Source Francisco Javier Sánchez Gallardo (pdf file)
See also
- ECJ C-80/20 (Wilo Salmson France) – Decision – Cancellation and reissuance of invoice does not change period for which VAT refund can be requested
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Right to Deduct VAT and ”Substance over form” concept
Join our Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU’s ViDA in Motion: How EU Member States Are Preparing for implementing Digital Reporting Requirements (DRR)
- EU Court Rules Triangulation VAT Simplification Inapplicable to Multi-Party Drop Shipments Involving Fraud
- EU Commission Seeks Feedback on Revising E-Invoicing Rules for Public Procurement
- CBAM from 2026: New TARIC Codes Mandatory for Import – No Correct Coding, No Import Approval
- Navigating VAT Exemptions: Recent ECJ Judgments and Their Implications for Intra-Community Transactions and Imports
