The judgment ECJ C-80/20 illustrates the dilemma between the EU law general principles and some particularities of VAT. Faced with the denial of a deduction, it is not strange to hear the argument of “no problem, a corrective invoice can be issued and deducted later, it is not necessary to appeal.” However, that is easier said then done…
Source Francisco Javier Sánchez Gallardo (pdf file)
See also
- ECJ C-80/20 (Wilo Salmson France) – Decision – Cancellation and reissuance of invoice does not change period for which VAT refund can be requested
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Right to Deduct VAT and ”Substance over form” concept
Join our Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU and India conclude landmark Free Trade Agreement
- Comments on ECJ Case T-363/25: Hungarian Tax Authorities Cannot Deny VAT Deduction Solely for Unreliable Invoices
- Comments on ECJ C-796/23: Consideration of Czech company for VAT purposes as ‘designated partner’ in violation of EU law
- Advocate General’s Opinion Clarifies VAT Treatment of Transfer Pricing Adjustments in Stellantis Portugal Case
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases -1 Judgment, 1 Hearing till Feb 25, 2026
