The judgment ECJ C-80/20 illustrates the dilemma between the EU law general principles and some particularities of VAT. Faced with the denial of a deduction, it is not strange to hear the argument of “no problem, a corrective invoice can be issued and deducted later, it is not necessary to appeal.” However, that is easier said then done…
Source Francisco Javier Sánchez Gallardo (pdf file)
See also
- ECJ C-80/20 (Wilo Salmson France) – Decision – Cancellation and reissuance of invoice does not change period for which VAT refund can be requested
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Right to Deduct VAT and ”Substance over form” concept
Join our Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Commission Backs Italy’s VAT Derogation Through 2028
- Comments on GC T‑575/24 – AG – Contrary to EU law if services provided to members are regarded as internal acts
- Comments on ECJ C-515/24 (Randstad España) – AG – Introduction of exclusion of VAT deduction of representation expenses by Spain not contrary to EU law
- Briefing Document & Podcast: VAT concepts ”Chain Transactions” & ”Triangulation” explained based on ECJ/CJEU cases
- Comments on ECJ C-744/23: No-Cure-No-Pay Services Are Subject to VAT
