In case 2 Afs 382/2019-33, the Supreme Administrative Court concluded that when a taxable supply is paid to the account of a supplier not disclosed by the tax administrator, the recipient of the taxable supply is not automatically liable for VAT. In the court’s view, it is necessary to test the good faith of the recipient of the supply, i.e. whether they knew or should have known and could have known that the VAT would not be paid by the supplier. The conclusion of the court is contrary to the normal practice of the tax administration of the Czech Republic.
Source Deloitte
Latest Posts in "Czech Republic"
- Overview of EET 1.0, Its Abolishment, and Introduction of EET 2.0
- Czech Republic Updates VAT and Tax Rules for App-Based Transport Providers, Effective January 2025
- GFD Issues Updated Tax Guidance for Mobile Transport Service Providers, Effective January 2025
- Comments on ECJ case C-796/23: AG Opinion – Separate Legal Entities Must Act Independently to Be Separate VAT Taxable Persons
- SAC Clarifies VAT Rules for Building Land Sales Before and After July 2025 Law Change














