A carries out demolition and insulation work and has not filed any sales tax returns. The Tax and Customs Administration has therefore imposed additional assessments on its own initiative, along with a tax return default penalty and a payment default penalty for each period. A’s objections to this were declared inadmissible due to non-excusable exceeding of the time limit. The requests for ex officio reduction were rejected.
The question is whether the objections were rightly declared inadmissible. If the objections should have been declared admissible, it is in dispute whether the additional assessments and the simultaneously imposed fines should be annulled.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Supreme Court Refers Key VAT Real Estate Questions to CJEU, Creating Market Uncertainty
- Dispute Over VAT on Final Payment for Business Transfer and Software Use Agreement, Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court 2025
- Supreme Court Confirms: No Destruction of Ruling; No Mediation or Foreign Establishment Proven
- General Court Excise T-690/24 (Kolinsen) – Judgment – Member State of arrival competent to levy excise duty in the event of irregularity detected on arrival
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients
