This article discusses questions relating to corporate residence and article 4(1) of the UK-US Double Tax Treaty raised in GE Financial Investments v HMRC [2021] UKFTT 210 (TC).
The question in this case was if a US partnership that was established in the UK, (also) had an establishment in the USA. The partnership argued that it had sufficient activities and precense in the USA, and that (therefore) it paid tax on it’s income in the USA, instead of in the UK.
It’s a Corprate Tax discussion, but also interesting for indirect tax, because the arguments used by the UK tax authorities (HMRC) give insight on their view of ‘place of business’, and the “degree of activity that is needed to constitute “business”.
Source Kluwertaxblog
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Updated Form VAT2: Partnership Registration Now Requires Each Partner’s Date of Birth
- Lowering VAT Threshold Risks Breaching Labour’s Manifesto, Warns Self-Employed Association
- UK Court Denies Casino’s Appeal for Alternative VAT Calculation, Blocking Tax Reduction
- Looking Again At Options To Tax supplies of land or buildings
- High Court Rules Curaçao Bank Unaware of £220m VAT Fraud, Dismissing Liquidators’ Claims
