The Appellant failing to pay its Service Tax Liability under RCM in a stipulated time but shown as liability in the Service tax Return under the Finance Act, 1994, which was repealed and was replaced by the Goods and Services Tax (“GST”). Accordingly, the Authorities rejected the refund application which was filed under Central Value Added Tax Credit Rules, 2004 (“CENVAT Credit Rules”) on the ground that the credit can only be claimed under the CGST Act.
Source: a2ztaxcorp.com
Latest Posts in "India"
- GST on Hotel Rooms ≤ Rs 7,500: 5% Rate, No ITC for Hotels or Business Travellers
- GSTN Releases Key FAQs on GSTR 9/9C Filing for Financial Year 2024-25
- Supreme Court: VAT Credit Cannot Be Denied Due to Supplier’s Tax Default
- Trickiest countries in which to achieve compliance
- India announces changes in the Invoice Management System
