The Danish Tax Agency had submitted a binding answer, according to which the questioner’s advice on nod allergy could not be exempted from VAT pursuant to section 13 (1) of the VAT Act. 1, no. 1. The National Tax Court found that it had not been established that the proposed company provided services that were covered by the concept of “treatment of persons”, as the services had the character of advice rather than treatment. Furthermore, the National Tax Court also found that it had not been established that the treatment was to be carried out by persons who had the required professional qualifications, as the complainant was not trained in the treatment of persons. The National Tax Court therefore upheld the Tax Agency’s binding answer.
Source: skat.dk
Latest Posts in "Denmark"
- Denmark to Replace OIOUBL 2.1 with NemHandel BIS 4 for E-Invoicing by 2029
- Danish Fiscal Model: Architecture, System Design, Workflows, and Technical Data Structures (XML/SAF-T)
- Tax Exemption for Share Transfer to Charitable Foundation Supporting Single Parents in Denmark
- Requirement for Financial Security for VAT, A-tax, and AM Contributions Registration Upheld, Amount Reduced
- Denmark Clarifies VAT Rules for Gospel Choir Singing Lessons by Self-Employed Directors
