The Danish Tax Agency had submitted a binding answer, according to which the questioner’s advice on nod allergy could not be exempted from VAT pursuant to section 13 (1) of the VAT Act. 1, no. 1. The National Tax Court found that it had not been established that the proposed company provided services that were covered by the concept of “treatment of persons”, as the services had the character of advice rather than treatment. Furthermore, the National Tax Court also found that it had not been established that the treatment was to be carried out by persons who had the required professional qualifications, as the complainant was not trained in the treatment of persons. The National Tax Court therefore upheld the Tax Agency’s binding answer.
Source: skat.dk
Latest Posts in "Denmark"
- Danish Tax Council Clarifies VAT and Electricity Tax Rules for EV Charging Services
- Denmark Clarifies VAT Deduction Rules for Subcontractor Services in Concert and Event Industry
- Danish Tax Council Clarifies Electricity Tax and VAT for EV Charging Station Operators
- Danish Court Denies VAT Deductions for Concert Company Due to Insufficient Subcontractor Documentation
- Tax and VAT Treatment for Charging Stations: Electricity Tax Refunds, Billing Basis, and VAT Deductions
