The Appellant contended that, being an LLP is not covered in definition of ‘body corporate’ and hence not liable to pay service tax under reverse charge mechanism (“RCM”), as applicable to a body corporate in terms of Notification No. 30/2012-ST dated June, 2012.
Source: a2ztaxcorp.com
Latest Posts in "India"
- GST: India’s Grand Federal Bargain Becomes Imperfect Political Compromise After Eight Years
- GST 2.0 Boosts Bengal’s Economy with Rate Cuts on Local Goods and Industries
- Finance Minister Addresses GST Transition Concerns, Outlines Measures for Smooth Implementation
- Rajasthan HC Rules Principal-to-Principal Service Contracts as Export, Not Intermediary, Under GST
- CBAM Compliance Guide for Indian Exporters: 2025–26 Edition
