The Appellant contended that, being an LLP is not covered in definition of ‘body corporate’ and hence not liable to pay service tax under reverse charge mechanism (“RCM”), as applicable to a body corporate in terms of Notification No. 30/2012-ST dated June, 2012.
Source: a2ztaxcorp.com
Latest Posts in "India"
- Supreme Court Rules: “Parts” Must Functionally Integrate into Machinery, Rejecting End-Use Claims
- Centre to Consider Panel’s GST Recommendations on Air Purifiers, Tells Delhi High Court
- Sunglasses Not Classified as Spectacles, Taxable at Higher 12.5% VAT: Punjab & Haryana HC
- BMW Urges No GST Hike on EVs as Electric Car Sales Surge Over 200% in 2025
- Supreme Court: Hostel Rooms for Students Qualify as Residential Dwellings, GST Exempt













