R. J. Trading Co. Vs Commissioner of CGST, Delhi North & Ors. (Delhi High Court)
We are of the opinion that the Additional Commissioner, CGST Delhi North Commissionerate exercised his powers for according authorization to conduct search and seizure, at RJT’s premises, even though the jurisdictional ingredients were absent. The request of Joint Commissioner (AE), Gautam Budh Nagar conveyed through the communication dated 05.03.2021, was only to ascertain as to whether RJT, which was the L2 supplier of M/s Mridul Tobie Inc., was in existence. There was no independent application of mind by the Additional Commissioner, CGST Delhi North Commissionerate.
Source Taxguru
Latest Posts in "India"
- GST: India’s Grand Federal Bargain Becomes Imperfect Political Compromise After Eight Years
- GST 2.0 Boosts Bengal’s Economy with Rate Cuts on Local Goods and Industries
- Finance Minister Addresses GST Transition Concerns, Outlines Measures for Smooth Implementation
- Rajasthan HC Rules Principal-to-Principal Service Contracts as Export, Not Intermediary, Under GST
- CBAM Compliance Guide for Indian Exporters: 2025–26 Edition
