The appeals court concluded that the retailer did not “use” the materials in Michigan because it lacked control over the materials, despite the fact that it provided the mail vendor with the list of its Michigan customers and directed the dates on which mailings were to be distributed.
Source: KPMG
Latest Posts in "United States"
- Washington, D.C. Increases Sales Tax to 6.5% on Goods and Services Starting October 2025
- Sitka, Alaska Declares Sales Tax-Free Days for Black Friday Weekend, November 28-29, 2025
- Florida Introduces Extended Sales Tax Holiday for Firearms and Outdoor Gear, September-December 2025
- Rhode Island Implements 7% Sales Tax on Short-Term Parking in Lots and Garages
- Understanding the 1% Transportation Sales Tax Referendum: Key Facts and Implications for Voters
