In this case, a non-resident company purchased manufacturing services from a related party, established in Romania. The non-resident company was the owner of the raw material and of the finished products while the resident company contributed with the labor and owned the related production equipment.
The Romanian tax authorities argued that the non-resident business had a fixed establishment in Romania.
Source: lexology.com (tip: open in incognito mode)
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CEN Approves Revised EN 16931: A Milestone for ViDA Implementation
- Successful Implementation of VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) Discussed with Commissioner Hoekstra
- General Court T-638/24 (D GmbH) – AG Opinion – VAT on Intra-Community Acquisitions Not Precluded by Errors
- Commission Backs Italy’s VAT Derogation on certain vehicles Through 2028
- Comments on GC T‑575/24 – AG – Contrary to EU law if services provided to members are regarded as internal acts
