In this case, a non-resident company purchased manufacturing services from a related party, established in Romania. The non-resident company was the owner of the raw material and of the finished products while the resident company contributed with the labor and owned the related production equipment.
The Romanian tax authorities argued that the non-resident business had a fixed establishment in Romania.
Source: lexology.com (tip: open in incognito mode)
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJEU Confirms TP Adjustments as VAT-Applicable Services, Requires Supporting Documentation
- Court of Justice Rules on VAT for Intra-Group Services and Evidence Requirements for Deductions
- ECJ Rules Compensation Payments in Transfer Pricing as Taxable Supply for VAT Purposes
- ECJ Rules Non-Transactional Profit Adjustments by Principal Are VAT-Applicable Services in Arcomet Case
- Understanding VAT Implications on Transfer Pricing: Insights from Arcomet Case C-726/23
