The fact that, according to X, the immovable property was actually used for other purposes, such as storage, did not make this different. As to the second requirement, the Court ruled that X had not excluded the use of the immovable property as parking space in the lease agreement.
Source:
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- E-invoicing obligation in the Netherlands: where does The Hague really stand?
- AG Dutch Supreme Court: When Does Brick Paving Qualify as Developed Land in Dutch Law?
- Benelux Study Day on E-Invoicing (25 March 2025): Conclusions and Strategic Outlook
- Netherlands Reveals Four-Phase Plan for EU ViDA Implementation by 2030 Deadline
- Easily Avoiding VAT on Webshops: A Loophole Exploited by Business Accounts
