The fact that, according to X, the immovable property was actually used for other purposes, such as storage, did not make this different. As to the second requirement, the Court ruled that X had not excluded the use of the immovable property as parking space in the lease agreement.
Source:
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Response to Follow-up Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation Sector, March 2026
- Fuel Retailers Urge Tax Cuts as Pump Prices Soar, Warn Tanken Becoming Unaffordable
- Brokerage Fees Only Partially Deductible Due to Link with Agricultural Exemption, Court Rules
- Dutch Tax Authority Switching to Rabobank Account Numbers from May 1, 2026: What to Know
- Despite the absence of a tax representative, the application of the zero rate
