The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled in the highly anticipated Titanium case that own staff is required for a ‘fixed establishment’ for VAT. In the case at hand, real property used by the owner for leasing activities does not constitute a VAT fixed establishment if the owner does not deploy its own local staff to perform the leasing.
Source: loyensloeff.com
ECJ Case: C-931/19
For other posts about this case, please click here.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- ViDA Risks: Key Concerns Highlighted by the European Commission
- ECJ C-535/24 (Svilosa) – Judgment – Acts by a creditor to recover debt without debtor’s mandate aren’t classified as ‘supply of services’
- General Court VAT case – T-569/25 (X-GmbH) – Questions – Can good faith be excluded from VAT assessment procedure?
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases – 4 Judgments, 3 AG Opinions, 1 Hearing till October 28, 2025
- ECJ Rules VAT Refund Administration Fees Taxable in Hungary for Non-EU Customers
