In the First Tier tribunal (FTT) case of Jupiter Asset Management Group Ltd the issue was the value of management services to an associated third party VAT group.
Background
The value is important because if HMRC believe that a supply between two connected parties (as defined by The Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 Section 839) is undervalue and the recipient cannot recover the relevant input tax in full, it is permitted via The VAT Act 1994, Schedule 6, PART 2, para 1 (1) to substitute open market value (OMV) by way of a Notice.
This paragraph is specifically intended to counter tax avoidance. If a supply between connected persons is made below open market value for a legitimate reason that the trader can substantiate, and which is unconnected with avoidance HMRC has the discretion not to issue a Notice. In Jupiter, HMRC directed that OMV be used to calculate the charge as it considered that value was too low and issued an assessment for underdeclared output tax.
Source Marcus Ward
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Implements EPR Scheme: Producers Pay Fees for Packaging Waste Management Starting 2025
- Rachel Reeves Considers VAT Adjustments Amid Budget Challenges Despite Labour’s Pledge
- Cayman Implements New Taxes on Imported Vehicles
- Tribunal Rules Nitrous Oxide Not Zero-Rated Food in Telamara VAT Case
- HMRC Updates VAT Notice 700/18: New Guidelines for Bad Debt Relief Claims
