In the First Tier tribunal (FTT) case of Jupiter Asset Management Group Ltd the issue was the value of management services to an associated third party VAT group.
Background
The value is important because if HMRC believe that a supply between two connected parties (as defined by The Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 Section 839) is undervalue and the recipient cannot recover the relevant input tax in full, it is permitted via The VAT Act 1994, Schedule 6, PART 2, para 1 (1) to substitute open market value (OMV) by way of a Notice.
This paragraph is specifically intended to counter tax avoidance. If a supply between connected persons is made below open market value for a legitimate reason that the trader can substantiate, and which is unconnected with avoidance HMRC has the discretion not to issue a Notice. In Jupiter, HMRC directed that OMV be used to calculate the charge as it considered that value was too low and issued an assessment for underdeclared output tax.
Source Marcus Ward
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- VAT Registration: What Are The Big Issues
- Autumn Budget VAT Consultation May Affect Social Housing and Real Estate Sector Compliance
- VAT IOSS Scheme: Intermediary Registration Available from April 2026 for Non-EU Businesses
- UK Tribunal Ruling Paves Way for 5% VAT on Public EV Charging, Treasury Reviews Policy
- Court Rules Public EV Charging Should Have Reduced 5% VAT Instead of 20%
