The Hon’ble Madras High Court in M/s. D. Y. Beathel Enterprises v. the State Tax Officer [W.P. (MD) Nos. 2127, 2117, 2121, 2152, 2159, 2160, 2168, 2177, 2500, 2530, 2532, 2534, 2538, 2539, 2540, 2503 & 2504 of 2021 & Ors., dated February 24, 2021] quashed the order passed by the officer levying the entire tax liability on the purchasing dealer without involving the seller, where the payment of tax has been made by the purchasing dealer, but the same has not been remitted to the Government by the Seller. Held that, the omission on the part of the Seller to remit the tax should have been viewed very seriously and strict action ought to have been initiated against the seller.
Source Taxguru
Latest Posts in "India"
- CBAM Compliance Guide for Indian Exporters: 2025–26 Edition
- Government Scrutinizes E-commerce for Ignoring CST Rate Cuts, Investigates 3,000 Consumer Complaints
- Industry Body Urges Government for Relief Measures for Small Chemists During GST 2.0 Transition
- CESTAT Rules Electronic Software Downloads Exempt from Customs Duty in HCL Technologies Case
- India’s GST 2.0 Sparks Concerns in Nepal Over Smuggling and Trade Deficit
