The Court concluded that the VAT returns had been made incorrectly. Furthermore, it appeared that bank account numbers on the purchase and sales invoices and on bank statements were not the account numbers of suppliers or clients of BV A and / or BV B. The invoices and bank statements were false and drawn up by X according to the Court. Because of his actions, X had disadvantaged the tax authorities for more than € 2.2 million.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Thrift Shops Return to Court to Challenge VAT on Second-Hand Goods
- E-invoicing and Digital Reporting for Cross-border Transactions Starting July 2030
- Amendment to VAT Assessment Decision on Tank Cards and Interest Charges
- Thrift Shops Return to Court Over VAT Collection Dispute
- Customs Court Rules Doctor Role Play Set as Toys, Not Clothing
