The Court concluded that the VAT returns had been made incorrectly. Furthermore, it appeared that bank account numbers on the purchase and sales invoices and on bank statements were not the account numbers of suppliers or clients of BV A and / or BV B. The invoices and bank statements were false and drawn up by X according to the Court. Because of his actions, X had disadvantaged the tax authorities for more than € 2.2 million.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- ViDA E‑Invoicing and Digital Reporting in the Netherlands: Strategic Choices and Phased Timeline to 2032
- Netherlands releases cover letter on ViDA assessment
- VAT on Alcoholic Drinks Included in Theater Ticket: Separate Supply, Standard Rate Applies, No Equality Violation
- VAT on Alcoholic Drinks Served During Theatre Intermissions: Separate Taxation from Admission Fee
- VAT on Theatre Tickets: Alcoholic Drink During Intermission Taxed at Standard Rate, Not Reduced Rate
