The Court concluded that the VAT returns had been made incorrectly. Furthermore, it appeared that bank account numbers on the purchase and sales invoices and on bank statements were not the account numbers of suppliers or clients of BV A and / or BV B. The invoices and bank statements were false and drawn up by X according to the Court. Because of his actions, X had disadvantaged the tax authorities for more than € 2.2 million.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No Reduced VAT Rate for Nightclub Entry Fees with DJ Performances, Court Rules
- Tax Plan 2026: Reduced VAT Rate for Culture, Media, and Sports Retained
- Proposed VAT Revision Rules for Renovation Services Starting 2026: Key Changes and Implications
- VAT deduction apartment: business office or home? Ruling on actual use and the principle of equality
- Budget 2026: VAT Rate Reversals, Property Rules & Cross-Border Compliance
