Apply actual use if pro rata results in conflict with reality
Again a judgment of the Supreme Court from the old days.
Maatschap X operates an apartment building, consisting of 6 business premises, 78 apartment houses and 10 garages. 5 business premises were rented out; an option request was made for 4 of them. X had work carried out on the roof and had the outside painted. It has allocated the VAT on a pro rata basis (ratio of exempt or taxed rental).
Source BTW jurisprudentie
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No VAT Fiscal Unity Without Financial Integration, Rules Advocate General Ettema
- No VAT group according to AG due to lack of financial interconnectedness
- VAT in 2026: mark these deadlines in your calendar
- Supreme Court Upholds Additional VAT Assessment Due to Insufficient Proof Against Revenue Reconstruction
- Tourist Tax Included in VAT Base for Campsite Services, Supreme Court Rules
