A states that he has commissioned the development of an app to B. He has claimed a deduction with regard to invoices made in his name from a part of B. B has stated to the Tax Authorities that he does not know A and that the invoices are not to originate.
The Court of Appeal of ‘s-Hertogenbosch ruled that it has not become plausible that a legal relationship has been established between the part of B and A established in the Netherlands, whereby mutual performances would have been exchanged. Then there is no right to deduction and the additional assessment is rightly imposed. The Tax and Customs Administration does not make it plausible that A himself prepared the invoices or had them drawn up, so the offense fine will be annulled.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Reduced VAT Rate for Open Access Publication Rights: Single or Separate Service from Reading Rights?
- Dutch Government Under Pressure to Act as Fuel Prices Soar Amid Middle East Conflict
- Amsterdam Court Convicts Director for Tax Fraud and Non-Cooperation, Imposes Community Service and Suspended SentencePoland
- ViDA E‑Invoicing and Digital Reporting in the Netherlands: Strategic Choices and Phased Timeline to 2032
- Netherlands announces changes to non-EU VAT refund scheme as of 1 April 2026













