According to the Supreme Court, the questions of the District Court did not lend themselves to an answer by way of a preliminary ruling. According to the Supreme Court, in this case there was no reason to deviate from the premise that a party was allowed to submit everything at its disposal as evidence.
Source: futd.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Court Ruling on VAT Deduction for School Renovation and Penalty Assessment, 20 March 2026
- Dutch Ornamental Horticulture VAT to Rise from 9% to 21% Starting January 2028
- Tax Assessment Upheld for Municipality Due to VAT Abuse in “School Model” Construction Scheme
- Scope of Reverse-Charge Scheme for Subcontracted Agricultural Work on Immovable Property by Contractors
- Management services for industry-wide pension fund taxed with VAT
