According to the Supreme Court, the questions of the District Court did not lend themselves to an answer by way of a preliminary ruling. According to the Supreme Court, in this case there was no reason to deviate from the premise that a party was allowed to submit everything at its disposal as evidence.
Source: futd.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No Defensible Position for VAT Fraudster, Rules Advocate General Van Kempen in Tax Case
- Smoking Cessation Programs Not Exempt from VAT Due to Lack of Required Medical Qualifications
- Payment Not Considered Compensation for Transfer of Generality of Goods, Article 37d Not Applicable
- Reduced VAT Rate Applies to Live Events Featuring Online Communities and Streamers, Court Rules
- Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over VAT Refund Requests for 2018; 2019 Claim Also Denied
