According to the Supreme Court, the questions of the District Court did not lend themselves to an answer by way of a preliminary ruling. According to the Supreme Court, in this case there was no reason to deviate from the premise that a party was allowed to submit everything at its disposal as evidence.
Source: futd.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Appeal to 35-year-old agreements does not inspire confidence that VAT is deductible
- No excusable delay in the event of late VAT refund requests
- Pension fund provides VAT-exempt insurance services during the performance of the benefit agreement
- Additional VAT Assessments Upheld; Misdemeanor Fines Dismissed
- Pension Fund’s Insurance Service Exempt from VAT; No Right to Input Tax Deduction
