This article outlines the main features of the concept of intervention of the VAT fixed establishment (FE) at EU level with a specific focus on Italy and Czech Republic approach and latest domestic developments. Moreover, the criticalities deriving from the lack of a uniform approach at the Member State level are also considered.
The intervention of a FE in another Member State may have implications for businesses in relation to the place of supply of services and the liability to pay VAT in a Member State. There is, however, no clear guidance across the EU, as to when an FE is deemed to have “intervened” in a transaction.
The 10 December 2020 Conversant/Valueclick ruling in France highlighted the VAT uncertainties businesses face when they operate a branch in another Member State.
In this client alert we will particularly highlight the domestic rules of Italy & the Czech Republic. While the focus of the alert is on these jurisdictions, the key take-away applies to all Member States: uniform and harmonized guidance is missing.
Source Baker & McKenzie
Latest Posts in "Czech Republic"
- Maximizing Czech VAT Revenue: How Much More Can Be Collected Without Raising Tax Rates?
- Key VAT Changes for 2026: New Rules, Refunds, and Financial Services Updates
- New Electronic VAT Refund System for Non-EU Tourists in Czech Republic from 2026
- EU Urges Czechia, Greece, and Slovakia to Fully Implement Key Customs Systems
- ECJ C-796/23 (Česká síť) – Judgment – Managing partner not liable for other partners’ independently provided service VAT













