The Supreme Court is of the opinion that in view of the facts, including the short duration of the availability of the chambers, the judgment of the Gerechtshof ‘s-Gravenhage is incomprehensible that in the present case, in addition to the availability of the chambers, the other actions and elements of the performance such as the design of a study, the provision of separate display cases, the supervision of an orderly progression of prostitution, and the provision of (additional) services (whether or not for a separate fee) must be considered or must be regarded as manifestly ancillary to the availability of the rooms.
Source BTW jurisprudentie in Dutch
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Response to Follow-up Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation Sector, March 2026
- Fuel Retailers Urge Tax Cuts as Pump Prices Soar, Warn Tanken Becoming Unaffordable
- Brokerage Fees Only Partially Deductible Due to Link with Agricultural Exemption, Court Rules
- Dutch Tax Authority Switching to Rabobank Account Numbers from May 1, 2026: What to Know
- Despite the absence of a tax representative, the application of the zero rate
