The Supreme Court is of the opinion that in view of the facts, including the short duration of the availability of the chambers, the judgment of the Gerechtshof ‘s-Gravenhage is incomprehensible that in the present case, in addition to the availability of the chambers, the other actions and elements of the performance such as the design of a study, the provision of separate display cases, the supervision of an orderly progression of prostitution, and the provision of (additional) services (whether or not for a separate fee) must be considered or must be regarded as manifestly ancillary to the availability of the rooms.
Source BTW jurisprudentie in Dutch
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Benelux Study Day on E-Invoicing (25 March 2025): Conclusions and Strategic Outlook
- Netherlands Reveals Four-Phase Plan for EU ViDA Implementation by 2030 Deadline
- Easily Avoiding VAT on Webshops: A Loophole Exploited by Business Accounts
- Tax authorities do not inspire confidence that there is a regular customer with ICLs
- Evading VAT via webshops turns out to be a piece of cake
