Hof ‘s-Hertogenbosch ruled on appeal that X does not demonstrate that the cars were transported to Italy in the context of deliveries. It can be left open whether he was actively involved in the VAT fraud. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation unfounded without further motivation (Article 81 paragraph 1 Law RO).
Source Taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Decree on the export of travellers’ baggage VAT
- Amendment of the VAT Real Estate Decree
- No rental-plus in case of subletting to conservatory
- Knowledge group: rental of solar roof project does not qualify as rental of immovable property
- Agricultural standards for VAT for private use 2025 in last VAT return 2025
