Hof ‘s-Hertogenbosch ruled on appeal that X does not demonstrate that the cars were transported to Italy in the context of deliveries. It can be left open whether he was actively involved in the VAT fraud. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation unfounded without further motivation (Article 81 paragraph 1 Law RO).
Source Taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands Plans €2 Fee on Non-EU Parcels; EU €3 Customs Levy from July 2026
- Netherlands Updates VAT Rules on Fuel Cards and Negative Interest, Effective October 2025
- Dutch Court Upholds Strict 6-Month Deadline for VAT Refunds on Solar Panel Installations
- Decree on the export of travellers’ baggage VAT
- Amendment of the VAT Real Estate Decree














