By Robert Praetzler,Partner Indirect Taxes at PwC
In a judgment published today (C-288/19, “Finanzamt Saarbrücken” – so sad that the ECJ stopped using the taxpayer name for so many cases nowadays), the ECJ decided that private use of company cars provided to employees is, generally speaking, not an art. 56 service.
Source: LinkedIn
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on ECJ C-121/24: Non-payment of declared VAT does not constitute VAT fraud
- European Parliament Approves Simplifications to Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)
- Comments on ECJ C-472/24: In-game gold: AG Kokott’s advice on VAT exemption, vouchers & margin scheme
- AG Kokott’s Opinion: VAT Exemption, Vouchers, and Margin Scheme for In-Game Gold Trading
- EU Reaches Agreement on 2028 Customs Reform
