VATupdate

ECJ C-612/20 Happy Education vs RO (Questions): School after school program VAT exempt?

On 17 November 2020 the Tribunal Cluj (Romania) submitted this case to the ECJ.  This cases focuses on the VAT exemption for education.


Article in the EU VAT Directive

Articles 132 (1) (i), 133 and 134


Facts

  • The applicant is a commercial company that offers after-school services, consisting in organizing additional activities on it educational curriculum. The main activities fall under the CAEN code 8559, ‘Other forms of education not classified elsewhere’. The services of applicant consist of homework assistance, educational programs, courses foreign languages ​​and crafts, sports activities, transport from school and meals.
  • The children participating in the Happy Education programs are enrolled at various educational institutions in Cluj-Napoca. The activities carried out by the applicant are identical to those of the program ‘School after school’ as regulated in the method of September 7, 2011, approved by Order No. 5349/2011 of the Minister of Education, Research, Youth and Sports.
  • Following an inspection by the defendant, Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Cluj, from April 16 to April 20, 2018, to check how was fulfilled the VAT obligations for the period from 1 August 2016 up to and including December 31, 2017, the defendant issued a tax audit report and an assessment established.
  • In these two transactions it is mainly determined that the turnover for July 2016 was higher than the upper limit for VAT exemption of RON 220,000 in accordance with Article 310 (1) of the Cod fiscal, and that the applicant therefore submits had to register for VAT from 1 August 2016. On that ground are chargeable additional payment obligations for an amount of RON 89 472 in VAT, corresponding to a taxable amount of 383 066 RON.
  • Defendant, Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj-Napoca, has the applicant’s objection to these acts was rejected by a decision on the objection
  • In view of this, the applicant submitted to the referring party on 12 March 2019 court brought an action for annulment of acts taken by defendants towards her.

Questions

1. Must Articles 132 (1) (i), 133 and 134 .. be interpreted as meaning that educational services such as those included in the national „School after school program, are covered by the concept of services which are closely related with school education ‘if those services are such as in the main proceedings performed by a private entity for profit, without one cooperation has been agreed with an educational institution?

2. If the first question is answered in the affirmative, acknowledgment of the applicant as a ‘body with similar purposes’ within the meaning of Article 132, paragraph 1 (i) ..  than arise from national legal regulations concerning authorization of activities under CAEN code 8559 “Other forms of education not classified elsewhere ”by the Oficiu Nauional al Registrului Comerțului (Commercial Register, Romania), or are established under reference to the public interest of additional educational activities with the goal of preventing school dropout, improving school performance, corrective education, accelerated learning, personal and social development integration?


Source: Curia


Similar ECJ cases


 

 

 

 

 

 

Sponsors:

Advertisements:

* click here if you have interesting news to share *