X should have done more research and exercised more caution. In doing so, the Court pointed out some inconsistencies in the documentation of the deliveries, such as strange chronological orders. X should have noticed this because he was doing the administration.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Flashback on ECJ Cases C-320/88 (Shipping and Forwarding Enterprise Safe) – Economic ownership constitutes a supply of goods
- No margin scheme for thrift store for deliveries free of charge
- Knowledge Group Position Published on Sports Exemption
- VAT Exemption for University Sports Access and Equipment Rental
- Thrift Store Received Goods Free of Charge, No VAT Margin Scheme
