X should have done more research and exercised more caution. In doing so, the Court pointed out some inconsistencies in the documentation of the deliveries, such as strange chronological orders. X should have noticed this because he was doing the administration.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Despite the absence of a tax representative, the application of the zero rate
- Comments on T-184/25: Transfers of credit portfolios and VAT: AG puts credit management exemption under pressure
- New Four-Year VAT Adjustment for Investment Services on Real Estate Starting 2026
- VAT refund rightly refused due to unproven previous payment
- VAT Rules for Unpaid Invoices: When Can Entrepreneurs Reclaim or Repay VAT?
