X should have done more research and exercised more caution. In doing so, the Court pointed out some inconsistencies in the documentation of the deliveries, such as strange chronological orders. X should have noticed this because he was doing the administration.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Assessments: Audit Officer’s Presence at Objection Hearings Permitted
- Principle of legitimate expectations precludes the imposition of additional assessments
- Court Upholds VAT Assessments Despite “Sovereign Citizen” Arguments and Wet Signature Claim
- Abolition of reduced VAT rate for floriculture: justification of the estimation method and policy choice
- Ryan Acquires Svalner Atlas in Major European Tax Expansion
