The nonresident entity was using the factory, warehouse, and premises of the Spanish subsidiary and was even providing instructions to the subsidiary’s employees. In addition, the Swiss entity assumed all the risks. The court concluded that the Spanish subsidiary was a permanent establishment in Spain for VAT purposes and was required to charge Spanish VAT on its sales in Spain.
Source: Deloitte
See also THIS post about this case.
Latest Posts in "Spain"
- Verifactu: progress in digitalization or new burden for companies?
- Understanding Spain’s Verifactu and SII: New E-Invoicing Rules and Business Obligations from 2026
- Canary Islands Updates IGIC SII Rules: New Reporting Fields Effective October 2025
- Spain’s Digital VAT Reform: Mandatory E-Invoicing and Anti-Fraud Measures by 2026
- From ambiguity to Doctrine: Spanish Supreme Court Sets Cash Pooling Rules