The case centred on whether HMRC’s interpretation and application of the Lennartz accounting method was correct, specifically on what was deemed “non-business” activity and whether output value added tax (VAT) was accountable.
This case was about free education/vocational training to students, that was funded by government agencies.
The Upper Tribunal’s verdict was clear: no activity was “private” or “non-business” use and, as such, no output tax was accountable.
Sources:
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Implements EPR Scheme: Producers Pay Fees for Packaging Waste Management Starting 2025
- Rachel Reeves Considers VAT Adjustments Amid Budget Challenges Despite Labour’s Pledge
- Cayman Implements New Taxes on Imported Vehicles
- Tribunal Rules Nitrous Oxide Not Zero-Rated Food in Telamara VAT Case
- HMRC Updates VAT Notice 700/18: New Guidelines for Bad Debt Relief Claims
