Sweden’s Supreme Administrative Court issued its decision No. 6446-19 on 7 October 2020 that a Luxembourg company operating within the special rules for investment funds under EU directive 2011/61 on alternative investment fund managers (the AIFM directive) had a “real” establishment in Sweden, despite not satisfying traditional substance criteria. The ruling also may provide useful guidance for companies operating in other sectors.
Source: Deloitte
Latest Posts in "Sweden"
- Interpretation of “Actually Used and Enjoyed” for VAT Purposes in Sweden
- Supreme Administrative Court: VAT Reassessment for Group Services Requires Market Comparison for Each Service Individually
- Swedish Tax Agency’s VAT Revaluation Method for Intra-Group Services Rejected by Supreme and EU Courts
- E‑Invoicing and Digital VAT Reporting Reform in Sweden
- Updated Position: Transactions Between the Church of Sweden and Its Organizational Units, 2026
