Sweden’s Supreme Administrative Court issued its decision No. 6446-19 on 7 October 2020 that a Luxembourg company operating within the special rules for investment funds under EU directive 2011/61 on alternative investment fund managers (the AIFM directive) had a “real” establishment in Sweden, despite not satisfying traditional substance criteria. The ruling also may provide useful guidance for companies operating in other sectors.
Source: Deloitte
Latest Posts in "Sweden"
- Reassessment Statement on Tax Base for Staff Meals in Restaurants No Longer Applies
- Clarification: Who Qualifies as a Transport Operator According to the Swedish Tax Agency
- Taxation of Criminal Activities: Income and VAT Implications for Individuals under Swedish Law
- Sweden Clarifies Input VAT Apportionment Rules for Mixed Activities in New Guidance
- Sweden Clarifies Input VAT Apportionment Rules for Mixed Activities in New Tax Agency Statement
