On the one hand, the CJEU decided that this company is allowed to deduct the VAT
incurred on market studies related to the aborted transaction. However, on the other
hand, the CJEU refused the deduction of the VAT incurred on banking costs linked to
the issuing of bonds to finance the aborted transaction. This is because the funds
collected, due to the abortion of the initial deal, had been since used for another
activity that is not entitled to input VAT deduction. Therefore, the CJEU refused the
company’s argument that its original intention was to use these funds for activities
that open the right to deduct VAT, focusing solely on the funds’ effective use instead.
Source: Deloitte
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU Moves to Tighten the Fight Against VAT Fraud by Strengthening Cooperation Between Investigative Bodies
- Commission publishes simplification review of EU Deforestation Regulation
- EU Commission Issues New Guidance on AEO-Customs Cooperation Against Illicit Trade and Crime
- Understanding VAT Risks: The Pitfalls of Export Exemptions Across the EU, UK, Norway, and Switzerland
- VAT Concepts Explained: Navigating VAT/GST Exemptions for Financial Services: Global Perspectives, EU Case Law & Best Practices













