High Court directed to decide the matter by way of a reasoned order where the electronic credit ledger was blocked citing a mismatch in the Input Tax Credit claimed in GSTR-3B and that appearing in GSTR-2A.
High COurt held that writ petition is directed to be treated as a representation to Assistant Commissioner Palam Division CGST Delhi South, who is directed to decide the same by way of a reasoned order within four weeks, in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and/or its authorized representative. Till the said representation is decided by Assistant Commissioner Palam Division CGST Delhi South, the parties are directed to maintain status quo with regard to the impugned notice dated 28th January, 2020.
Source Taxguru
Latest Posts in "India"
- CBAM Compliance Guide for Indian Exporters: 2025–26 Edition
- Government Scrutinizes E-commerce for Ignoring CST Rate Cuts, Investigates 3,000 Consumer Complaints
- Industry Body Urges Government for Relief Measures for Small Chemists During GST 2.0 Transition
- CESTAT Rules Electronic Software Downloads Exempt from Customs Duty in HCL Technologies Case
- India’s GST 2.0 Sparks Concerns in Nepal Over Smuggling and Trade Deficit
