High Court directed to decide the matter by way of a reasoned order where the electronic credit ledger was blocked citing a mismatch in the Input Tax Credit claimed in GSTR-3B and that appearing in GSTR-2A.
High COurt held that writ petition is directed to be treated as a representation to Assistant Commissioner Palam Division CGST Delhi South, who is directed to decide the same by way of a reasoned order within four weeks, in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and/or its authorized representative. Till the said representation is decided by Assistant Commissioner Palam Division CGST Delhi South, the parties are directed to maintain status quo with regard to the impugned notice dated 28th January, 2020.
Source Taxguru
Latest Posts in "India"
- Fake GST Officials Arrested in Bengaluru and Kushinagar for Extorting Traders Using Forged IDs
- India Slashes Excise Duty on Petrol, Diesel to Shield Consumers Amid Global Oil Price Surge
- Understanding GST Vouchers: Classification, Tax Implications, and Key Distinctions from Discounts and Services
- IMF Economist Urges India to Adopt Single GST Rate and Direct Revenue Redistribution to Citizens
- BJD Urges Odisha Government to Cut VAT on Petrol, Diesel Amid Global Fuel Crisis Concerns
