The court held that the service bundle as a whole had to be regarded as a transfer of a right to use immovable property within the meaning of Article 27 of the VAT Act and thus, as a rule, was not subject to VAT (although there might be a chance to opt for VAT if requirements are met).
Source: Deloitte
Latest Posts in "Finland"
- VAT Treatment of Security Phone Rental and Monitoring Services: Independent or Combined Offerings?
- VAT Exemption for Parking Rights Transfer Within Same Tax Group: Advance Ruling 2025-2026
- Finland advances ‘report once’ digital reporting initiative
- VAT Deduction Rights for Tram Project Planning Costs Regardless of Construction Phase Progression
- Finland’s 2026 Budget: Lower Commodity Tax, Higher Tobacco and Broadcasting Taxes
