The plaintiff and the defendant (plaintiff) has a wine-growing business, a “wine commission” business and provides agricultural services. The plaintiff taxed his agricultural sales in accordance with § 24 UStG, the rest in accordance with § 20 UStG.
In 2006, the plaintiff expanded his business premises and built a mixed-use residential building.
Source: bundesfinanzhof.de
Latest Posts in "Germany"
- Avoiding VAT by Withdrawing Assets Before Sale: New Legal Clarifications
- Federal Fiscal Court Rules on VAT Exemption for Private Clinics: Criteria and Mixed Outcomes Explained
- TSE Replacement in Germany: Multi-Year POS Transition, Hardware vs. Cloud, and Strategic Planning
- BFH: Foreign Businesses Can Claim Input VAT via Assessment Procedure Despite No Ongoing Domestic Sales
- Reduced VAT Rate for Collector Coins; Gold and Silver Price Announcement for 2026
