The plaintiff and the defendant (plaintiff) has a wine-growing business, a “wine commission” business and provides agricultural services. The plaintiff taxed his agricultural sales in accordance with § 24 UStG, the rest in accordance with § 20 UStG.
In 2006, the plaintiff expanded his business premises and built a mixed-use residential building.
Source: bundesfinanzhof.de
Latest Posts in "Germany"
- Germany B2B E-Invoicing in 2027: Time to Prepare
- BMF Clarifies VAT Deduction Rules for Permanently Loss-Making Institutions: Two-Step Assessment Required
- Germany Publishes GEBA, Retires Old XRechnung Profiles to Boost E-Invoicing and Peppol Readiness
- Federal Court: Monthly/Quarterly and Annual VAT Returns Are Separate Acts, Not a Single Offense
- Incorrect VAT Statement in Intra-Community Supplies: Taxation Before Quick Fixes and EuG Decision
