The plaintiff and the defendant (plaintiff) has a wine-growing business, a “wine commission” business and provides agricultural services. The plaintiff taxed his agricultural sales in accordance with § 24 UStG, the rest in accordance with § 20 UStG.
In 2006, the plaintiff expanded his business premises and built a mixed-use residential building.
Source: bundesfinanzhof.de
Latest Posts in "Germany"
- Germany Mandates Electronic B2B Invoicing by 2028 with Phased Implementation
- Germany to Introduce 7% VAT Rate for Restaurants from 2026
- German Federal Tax Court Rules on Double RETT Assessment in Share Deal Transactions
- VAT Exemption for Care Services Financed Through Personal Budgets Under German Law
- New VAT Classification for Online Event Services Under German Tax Law
