The Maharashtra Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling while confirming the order of the Maharashtra Advance Ruling Authority held that the contract in the impugned case is though a composite supply not for immovable property, and therefore does not fall under the definition of ‘works contract’. The principal supply in the case is of Air conditioning units and the entire contract is taxable @ 28%.
Source Taxguru
Latest Posts in "India"
- VAT Pre-Deposit Refund Must Be Paid in Cash Under GST, Rules Madras High Court
- Karnataka High Court: Limitation for GST Refund Mandatory, Delay Condonable Under Writ Jurisdiction
- Karnataka High Court: GST Refund Limitation Mandatory, Delay Condonable Under Writ Jurisdiction
- GST Refund Limitation is Mandatory, but High Courts Can Condon Delay in Genuine Hardship Cases
- DGFT Tightens Certificates of Origin Rules, Mandates Automated Verification and Authorised Issuance
