On 10th September, 2020, the Tax Appeal Tribunal (“TAT”) in the case of Ess-ay Holdings Limited (“Ess-ay Holdings” or “the Company”) v Federal Inland Revenue Service (“FIRS”) held that a lease of real property whether for commercial or residential purposes does not amount to a supply of goods and services and therefore not subject to Value Added Tax (VAT). In reaching its decision, the TAT held that a lease of real property amounts to a transfer of incorporeal rights which is outside the scope of the VAT Act.
Sources:
Latest Posts in "Nigeria"
- Nigeria Mandates E-Invoicing for SMEs, Sets Timeline for Full Digital Tax Compliance
- Nigeria Sets E-Invoicing Compliance Deadlines: Phased Rollout Begins April 2026 for Large Taxpayers
- NCAA Orders Overland Airways to Refund Passengers Wrongly Charged VAT Before January 2026
- Nigeria Sets E-Invoicing Rollout Dates for Medium and Emerging Taxpayers Through 2028
- Nigeria Expands E-Invoicing System to Medium and Emerging Taxpayers with Phased Rollout Timelines













