Source Baillii.org
Extract: The way in which an entity is treated for one tax purpose (as a CIS contractor) does not necessarily determine how that entity’s activities may be treated for another tax purpose (VAT in this case). The fact that the Intermediate Companies may have not been in compliance with the CIS rules does not mean that they could not have made the supplies which Smart Organiser say they made. However, I have taken it as relevant to the overall context in which these supplies were made that the CIS status of the Intermediate Companies does not match the nature of the supplies which are alleged to have been made at the relevant time.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- High Court Rules Curaçao Bank Unaware of £220m VAT Fraud, Dismissing Liquidators’ Claims
- Hippodrome Casino’s VAT Recovery Appeal Rejected by Tribunal, Standard Method Upheld
- Rethinking Britain’s VAT: Simplify Rules and Expand Coverage for Economic Stability
- UK Implements EPR Scheme for Packaging, Modulated Fees Begin in 2026
- HMRC Announces New Vaping Products Duty and Stamps Effective October 2026