The fact that plaintiff imports the goods as part of its mediation activities is without prejudice to the fact that the goods are not intended for her. In that case, the reverse charge mechanism of article 23 of the Dutch VAT act cannot be applied. However, even if it were assumed that the defendant’s claim would succeed, no turnover tax can be imputed to the plaintiff. If the goods are destined for the plaintiff, she is also entitled to deduction . On balance, the claimant does not owe any turnover tax and therefore there is no question of under-payment of turnover tax.
Source: rechtspraak.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT deduction apartment: business office or home? Ruling on actual use and the principle of equality
- Budget 2026: VAT Rate Reversals, Property Rules & Cross-Border Compliance
- No deduction for VAT on consultancy costs for business succession within family
- VAT exemption for games of chance: strict interpretation for B2B game content
- Court Decision on Tax Rate for Art Products: Classification and Maker Status Dispute
