The Gujarat High Court, while upholding the validity of section 13(8)(b) read with Section 2(13) of the IGST Act, 2017 held that the service provided by intermediary in India cannot be treated as “export of services” under the IGST Act, 2017. It was observed that it is rightly included in Section 13(8) (b) of the IGST Act to consider the location of supplier of service as place of supply so as to attract CGST and SGST.
Source: taxscan.in
Latest Posts in "India"
- India to Impose New Health and Security Tax on Tobacco Machinery, Amend GST Compensation Levy
- Punjab Trade, Tax Bodies Threaten Statewide Stir Over Delayed VAT, GST Refunds
- Briefing Document & Podcast: E-Invoicing and E-Reporting in India
- Meghalaya Extends VAT Exemption on Fruit Wine to 10 Years, Boosting Local Wine Industry
- Allahabad HC: Arbitrary GST Registration Cancellations Without Reasons Amount to ‘Economic Death’ for Businesses
