Advocate General Ettema concludes that, based on national standards, the Court of Appeal rightly upheld X bv’s appeal to the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations. However, because the AG is unsure whether EU law offers less protection, the AG proposes to the Supreme Court to refer questions to the EU Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.
Source: taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Thrift Shops Return to Court Over VAT Collection Dispute
- Customs Court Rules Doctor Role Play Set as Toys, Not Clothing
- Adjustment of VAT deduction for services on immovable property: What can you still do?
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss
