Advocate General Ettema concludes that, based on national standards, the Court of Appeal rightly upheld X bv’s appeal to the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations. However, because the AG is unsure whether EU law offers less protection, the AG proposes to the Supreme Court to refer questions to the EU Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.
Source: taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Supreme Court Refers Key VAT Real Estate Questions to CJEU, Creating Market Uncertainty
- Dispute Over VAT on Final Payment for Business Transfer and Software Use Agreement, Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court 2025
- Supreme Court Confirms: No Destruction of Ruling; No Mediation or Foreign Establishment Proven
- General Court Excise T-690/24 (Kolinsen) – Judgment – Member State of arrival competent to levy excise duty in the event of irregularity detected on arrival
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients
