According to the Court, it could not be proved that BV A had deliberately, even in a conditional sense, made incorrect VAT returns, so that the deliberate use of false writing could not be proven
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No VAT group according to AG due to lack of financial interconnectedness
- VAT in 2026: mark these deadlines in your calendar
- Supreme Court Upholds Additional VAT Assessment Due to Insufficient Proof Against Revenue Reconstruction
- Tourist Tax Included in VAT Base for Campsite Services, Supreme Court Rules
- Majority Shareholding and Fiscal Unity: Assessing Financial Interdependence Among Collaborating Shareholder Groups
